🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities is set to be cut by over 50%, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced local governments to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which may have multiple councillors based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to vote for a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils could only establish a Māori ward by initially putting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations often devoted considerable time building community backing and pushing their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums alongside the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics however have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to create different wards – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation indicated the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 areas that chose to retain their wards.