🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."